| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jerick Ludhowe
Purification of Eden
XIN DOA'ED
58
   |
Posted - 2012.03.30 02:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Headerman wrote:-1 too.
Why give a better bonus to a cheaper ship?
Because a Fleet Command ship takes far more sp to fly than a t3. Do the math, me thinks you may be a bit surprised.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Purification of Eden
XIN DOA'ED
58
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 10:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Pinky Denmark wrote:
As such the T2 ship should be better, however the T3 should have more options.
Last I checked CCP were looking into switching the bonus%, however apply comand ship bonus to 2 types of warfare links and apply strategic cruiser bonus to all 4 types...
The problem is that t3 ships even w/o 4 bonuses are significantly more versatile than a specialized gang boosting fleet command will ever be... The truth of the matter is that t3s while supposedly being focused on versatility in truth are better at being specialized t2 ships than most specialized t2 ships excluding logi and recons of course. Take a look at some of the other bonuses they receive, example would be 10% active bonus... This is a bonus not found on "Specialized" ships with fewer slots, fewer bonuses, fewer rigs, and lower resists.... Where is this "jack of all trades, master of none" ship class t3 were suppose to be? All I see is a "jack of all trades, master of all".
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Purification of Eden
XIN DOA'ED
58
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 11:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Pinky Denmark wrote:I don't disagree with you and neither did I write anything contradicting what you just wrote?
Not arguing, more or less directly agreeing with you. I know it's a rare day on eve-o forums when you get quoted for an agreement rather than a flame. My bad 
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Wraiths of Abaddon
59
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 01:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:People calling for this change SEVERELY underestimate the benefits of being able to have your booster on field.
And what advantage would that be? Maybe a point and like 200 dps?
On grid boosting is far worse than off grid boosting... I don't even see how you could argue against this.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Wraiths of Abaddon
CELESTIAL ORDER RISING PHEONIX
59
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 13:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Was stated at fanfest that things are not working as intended. Fleet Commands are supose to be specialized towards the role of Fleet Boosting, T3s are not...
From what I was able to gather the current idea proposed by ccp is to decrease the bonus value t3s get to links, and increase fleet commands. T3s will however get link bonuses to 2 or 3 types of links, instead of just 1 like the fleet commands.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Wraiths of Abaddon
CELESTIAL ORDER RISING PHEONIX
59
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 21:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
delete |
Jerick Ludhowe
Wraiths of Abaddon
CELESTIAL ORDER RISING PHEONIX
59
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 11:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Alua Oresson wrote:
It depends on how many logistics ships you have. That is also why they are generally fit with the largest buffer with the highest resists that you can generally manage. They are generally so heavily tanked that it is usually a better idea to take out the opposing DPS, logistics or tackle before hitting the Command ships.
On grid Commands should always be target ed before sub cap dps..... The increase in tank of all ships on the field can be increased by 70+ % through increased resists and significant reductions in the duration of RR modules. Furthermore, a large fleet with several hundred sub caps will be able to nearly insta kill almost anything on the field, and yes this includes a super brick Fleet Command.
Having your gang links on grid is always a liability as it significantly increases the chance of loosing your super powerful tank bonuses. Higher bonuses + off grid is a much more intelligent approach... You're reaching for reasons that are nearly non existent Alua Oresson... Thankfully ccp agrees with the op as changes are already slated to happen. |
| |
|